Almost a quarter of voters plan to vote tactically in general election, poll finds

By agency reporter
October 22, 2019

Nearly a quarter of voters look set to ‘hold their nose’ and vote tactically at the next election, according to new BMG Research polling for the Electoral Reform Society (ERS).

In new analysis published by the ERS, pollsters found that millions could turn to tactical voting as many do not feel able to opt for their first choice under Westminster’s one-person-takes-all voting system.

With a general election before Christmas still possible, the polling found that nearly a quarter (24 per cent) of voters plan to use their vote tactically – turning to a party or candidate to keep out someone they dislike more. Based on 2017 general election turnout, this would equate to almost 7.8 million votes. Around two thirds (66 per cent) say they will vote for their first preference regardless of how likely they are to win, and 10 per cent say they don’t know.

When the same question was asked before the 2017 general election, 20 per cent of people said they would opt for someone who wasn’t their first choice. ERS analysis of the 2017 election also found that 68 per cent of votes had no impact on the result – 22 million votes went to waste. It also found that just 0.0016 per cent of voters choosing differently would have given the Conservatives a majority, while the election saw a rise in very marginal seats: 11 seats were won by fewer than 100 votes.

The UK remains the only country in Europe to use First Past the Post – where only one candidate wins in each area, and all other votes go to waste – for its main elections.

However, calls for reform have been growing in recent months. Earlier this month former Brexit Secretary David Davis argued that the current system in Westminster was "now failing to deliver either effective or democratic government", while the SNP’s Nicola Sturgeon and several Conservative MPs have also voiced calls for reform.

Darren Hughes, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society, said: “With nearly a quarter of voters feeling that they can’t vote for the party of their choice it’s becoming clearer than ever that time is running out for Westminster’s broken voting system.

“For too long First Past the Post has skewed our elections beyond recognition, piling up wasted votes and forcing people to make tactical choices at the ballot box, depriving them of voting for the party that most accurately represents their views.

“If we had a fair, proportional voting system – as in Scotland and most of the developed world – this problem simply wouldn’t exist: you can vote for who you want, and if your first choice doesn’t stand a chance, your second choice is counted instead.

“It’s long past time Westminster moved into the 21st century and ensured people were heard and represented – rather than constantly having to game the system.”

Current polls put Labour and the Conservatives on a combined vote share of around 60 per cent – around 10 points less than the lowest ever joint result in a general election. Voters are keen to ‘shop around’ more than ever – but are hampered by a warped electoral system, say the ERS.

All major parties except the Conservatives and Labour back a switch to proportional representation. There is a strong push in Labour for the party to back fair votes however, with John McDonnell a keen supporter of reform.

* Electoral Reform Society


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.