Court ruling paves way for new claims against Shell over pollution in Niger Delta

By agency reporter
June 22, 2014

A landmark ruling by a UK court has paved the way for the oil company Shell to be finally held accountable for devastating oil pollution in the Niger Delta, says Amnesty International.

In a judgment delivered by Mr Justice Akenhead on 20 June, the London Technological and Construction Court found that short of providing policing or military defence of its pipelines, Shell was responsible for taking reasonable steps to protect them. This would include measures such as installing leak detection systems, surveillance equipment and anti-tamper equipment.

The decision is an important milestone in the decades-long struggle for justice in the Niger Delta, where pollution associated with Shell’s operations has had an overwhelming impact.

The ruling comes as part of a civil claim brought by people from the Bodo community in the Niger Delta. The community was devastated by two massive spills in 2008 and 2009 from an old and leaking Shell pipeline.

Speaking from outside the court, Amnesty’s Corporate Accountability Campaigner, Joe Westby, said: “For more than five years the people of Bodo have been living day by day with the devastating consequences of these spills. Today’s judgment is an important step towards justice for the deprivations this community has had to suffer.”

Shell has consistently refused to disclose the age or condition of its pipeline. For years the company has blamed the massive oil pollution associated with its operations on theft of oil and other illegal activities. But it has taken almost no effective action to prevent the theft of oil and secure its pipelines.

Vulnerable infrastructure has been left exposed to vandalism and theft. And alarmingly, evidence emerged last year to suggest that even Shell’s own contractors may be involved in oil theft.

In a report published last year, Bad Information: Oil Spill Investigations in the Niger Delta, Amnesty exposed many of Shell’s claims on oil pollution in the region as “deeply suspect and often untrue”.

The court ruling has opened the door for Nigerian claimants to demand compensation if oil leaks were a result of sabotage or theft – if the sabotage or theft was due to “neglect on the part of the [licence] holder or his agents, servants or workmen to protect, maintain or repair any work structure or thing.”

Yet within minutes of the judgment being delivered, Amnesty says, Shell fired off a press release claiming “senior English judge rules in favour of Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary”.

Amnesty International’s Director of Global Issues, Audrey Gaughran said: “The court’s message is clear – if you don’t take adequate measures to protect your pipelines from tampering, you could be liable for the damages caused.

“Shell’s representation of the facts in this case beggars belief. Their response is typical of a company desperate to avoid being held to account for years of failure.”


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.